original in nl Floris Lambrechts
nl to en Floris Lambrechts
As dutch editor of LinuxFocus I work on the magazine every week. At this moment I am mostly proofreading other people's translations to dutch. In the non-virtual world I was just recently trying to improve my juggling skills - I do fairly well now with 3 clubs, but 4 balls at once is still one too much for me.
After the long waiting time, Mozilla has already become an old animal. They bread fast in the Mozilla family: the new generation (1.0.1 and 1.1) has emerged and when you read this, 1.2 may just be born.
After many hours of testing and fiddling with the browser capabilities of these youngsters, I describe my experiences below.
In the first part I take a look at what's available in the standard browser, and then I review two of the many available add-ons.
First off, you have to choose a version.
1.0.1 is actually the 'one and onlyTM' Mozilla
1.0, but with a few less bugs and some security issues fixed. If you prefer stability and compatibility, this is the one for you. Otherwise you take version
1.1 or later - that's where all the new functionality will show up. You can track the development on the roadmap.
The installation went very smoothly: just choose the Linux x86 Net Installer on the 'download' page and execute it (sometimes also available in other languages). The Net Installer (less than 100 kB) allows you to choose which Mozilla components you like to have - if you take the 'Custom' installation - and after that it does its job. They just can't make it simpler than this.
By default, it installs in
/usr/local/mozilla, but you can change the location. It's possible to install different Mozilla versions alongside each other - my
/usr/bin/mozilla is just a simple shell script that goes to the right dir and starts '
mozilla &'. The different versions are hard to distinguish from each other - the differences that I noted are explained in the text below. You can check what version you are running in the Help menu (
Never forget that in a lot of cases, you just don't need stuff like ChatZilla (the IRC chat-client), the Composer, the Mailer/newsreader or the adress book. If all you want is the browser, it's a smart thing to only install what you need (don't forget to choose the 'Custom' install in that case).
As a simple, plain browser Mozilla has of course though competiton, Galeon for example. That one uses the heart of Mozilla, (the rendering engine Gecko), but everything else is lighter and smaller. And also Konqueror of KDE and Opera are still around, both worthy alternatives.
If you choose to use Mozilla, you'll have to accept the fact that it uses a lof of memory. I never found that it felt 'slow', and the startup-time also has also improved since the days before
1.0. But Mozilla still likes a huge chunk of RAM, just like KDE by the way. Sad but true. For some older systems a RAM upgrade is probably something you can consider.
Just a remark: I often hear that 'the Linux desktop' is really heavy compared to 'Windows'. Agreed, KDE is not small, but you have to know what you're comparing with! It can do much more than -say- Windows98. In fact you should compare a recent Linux with a server edition of WindowsXP (although... ;-). And then it shows: Linux does a great job. For older systems you just have to seek out a lighter window manager / desktop - and your system will be just as fast. Or just run your desktop on the heavy server in the network...
I also hear that the new Gnome needs less resources than its predecessor, which I find a very good development.
A problem with 'alternative' browsers is that some sites become unusable. Let it be clear that Mozilla is not an 'alternative' browser! There are very few sites that display errors, or nothing at all. And in that case you can safely blame the site designer: Mozilla follows the standards almost perfectly, a very important accomplishment. Congratulations to the developers! (and death to all the webmasters that make sloppy sites on purpose!)
This being said, let's investigate whether the bells and whistles of the browser are of any use to us.
The amount of included features and options is quite impressive. You get a good idea of the possibilities by simply browsing the well-structured Preferences menu (
Edit=>Preferences). Below we take a look at many of these features.
Tabbed browsing is pretty well-known by now. It is a system that allows you to open multiple sites in a single window. Each page has its onw 'tab', on which you can click to 'activate'. It is mainly useful to avoid having tens of Mozilla windows open at once. I use and like the tabs, but something bothers me: why does every application has to invent yet another multiple document interface? Mozilla has such a
MDI, Kate the KDE editor, Opera and Galeon too... Each one with different concepts and different keybindings. And then there is KDE itself, which groups windows of the same program under a single button in the taskbar. Added together, this makes for a very confusing situation - but in the end I think Mozilla has one of the better systems. Note that Konqueror from KDE 3.1 on will also support tabbed browsing.
Be sure to take a look at the options for tabbed browsing. I like to 'load tabs in the background', and I make sure that clicking the middle mouse button over a link opens a new tab. You can also make sure that Control+Enter in the location bar opens a new tab. The best thing about the tabs are the keybindings: Control+T opens a new empty tab, Control+Page Up and Control+Page Down change between tabs, and Control+W closes the current one. And finally, just for convenience: Control+L selects the text (URL) in the location bar.
The nice thing about the bookmarks (that come with an extensive management system) is the ability to save multiple tabs under one bookmark (
Bookmarks=>File Bookmark, and then choose 'File as group'). In version 1.1 it can be done even faster: simpy choose
Bookmarks=>Bookmark This Group of Tabs. Very nice to open up a standard set of news sites for example, or to start surfing in the morning on the pages you had open the day before. I only mis a little feature from Konqueror, where you can not only
Add to Bookmarks in the main
Bookmarks menu, but also in its sub-menu's. But don't worry, so far I can still live with it ;-).
With F9 you turn on the sidebar (or, rather, turn it off :-). By clicking on its border, you can minimise it to a couple of pixels width. What exactly would make the sidebar an advantage over a nice simple website is unclear to me, although I suspect that Netscape uses them extensively in their browsers. Inside it you can see tabs like 'search', 'history', 'what's related' and 'bookmarks'.
Luckily anyone can make their own sidebars, and as a result many others are available. Some sites offer a 'Netscape sidebar' to track their news messages. I tried some that contain information about the tags of the document formats HTML, XHTML and SVG (from zvon.org, who by the way do translations of their pages the LF way). Installation of these sidebars is straightforward: click, choose 'OK' and everything will be all right, even when you're not root. I personally would like to see a sidebar that validates the current page with validator.W3.org. As lazy but well-meaning html writer I would really welcome such a thing ;-)
Mozilla is also able to remember passwords and form data; this is something I turn of immediately. (Yuk, I just don't trust it.)
You can configure which buttons should be visible in the toolbar - 'Home', 'Search', 'Print', 'Go' and 'Bookmarks' are not necessary in my view. This yields more space on the screen to display the URL. Configurable in
I do not really like the standard look, the 'Classic' theme. It resembles the old & grey Netscape 4 and makes it difficult to recognise the active tab. Compared with 'Classic', I find the also supplied 'Modern' theme a whole lot better. There are several other themes on the web, so everyone should be able to find her favourite. For smaller displays I would recommend a 'tiny' theme; I myself use the colourful and small 'Orbit 3m'.
The other part of smart browsing is the 'location bar auto complete', something that most current browsers already have. I'm not lyrical about it :-)
1.2, of which I was only able to test the alpha version, contains the new feature called 'Type Ahead Find'. This is a nice way to navigate without using the mouse: you just type a part of the link you want to activate, and Mozilla will select it.
Enter will do to follow the link. For example: you want to follow the first link below this line (Plugins and...), so
Enter and Mozilla will take care of the rest.
Once you know enough key bindings, it becomes very easy to navigate textually without switching between the keyboard and the mouse.
A nice extra feature is that you can also search regular text by beginning the search with a
Other things to remember:
Escape cancels the current search, and with (
F3 you can search forwards (or backwards).
cast' on the LinuxFocus.org main page.
Aside from the standard features, you can get a lot of extras for the browser. Mozilla's openness makes it relatively simple to build extensions for it, and that has obviously paid off.
There are the 'old-school' plugins (see the article: Plugins and Mozilla 1.0), there are sidebars that start to resemble complete applications, and then there are the other add-ons. By lack of time space we can not describe them all, but there are ad blockers, surf anonymisers, a calendar, spellcheck, Jabber messenger, a site downloader, ... Follows the links at the bottom: MozDev lists a lot of add-ons. The following addons were tested by yours truly.
Mozilla speaks English of course, but that is not all. Intalling other languages is easy: clicking trough in
Edit=>Preferences=>Appearance=>Languages/Content will lead you to a page where all the translations are listed. Clicking will do for the installation, at least if you have root rights and your Mozilla version is not struggling (it once refused the translation, but kept on working fine as allways). In some (or all?) languages you will see that the keyboard shortcuts are not translated, which is partly very convenient and partly annoying. I was told that translating the shortcuts is a source of conflicts, and no software exists for Mozilla to detect and to help solve these conflicts. Also be aware of the fact that not all Mozilla builds have translations in your preferred language - you can check that in advance over here.
If you're not a native English speaker, don't forget to set up your favourite languages (
Navigator=>Languages), as used by some sites to automatically show you a translated version of their pages (e.g. debian.org).
The installation is smooth as always, provided you have root rights. I really enjoyed playing with mouse gestures, but it never made me 'addicted' to it. Most often clicking on buttons (or using keyboard shortcurts) is just as fast, and sometimes a 'gesture' was mis-interpreted by the software (i.e. I performed it incorrect). But the possibility of creating your own gestures is very promising...
The other part of Optimoz is 'RadialContext'. This is an implementation of a so-called 'pie menu', a kind of round menu system that appears around the cursor. By moving the mouse in 1 of the 4 (or 8) directions you make a menu choice. It is kind of difficult to explain, but you can see it with your own eyes if you are using mozilla: just surf to this page and see the look & feel in action. This is just a demonstration: the actions you perform will have no effect until you install RadialContext yourself (simple if you are root, as always).
In the image you see the standard pie menu containing four functions in the directions up, down, left and right. In between are four sub-menus which are accessed by moving the mouse pointer diagonally in the corresponding direction without releasing the mouse button. Top-right, for example, there is the menu of the tabs (shown in the middle part of the image).
This sub-menu has functions to open or close a tab, and to go to the next or previous one.
This is pretty convenient to browse without touching the keyboard.
The other sub-menus deal with functions concerning 'window', 'tasks' and 'page'. In the 'normal' menu, the four main functions serve to reload the page, to stop the loading, or to go back or forth in the history.
Used over an image, the four main directions get different functions, as you can see in the right part of the image.
There you can also see what happens when you don't move the mouse for a while: a little text explanation appears next to the menu choices.
Used over a link, the menu changes once again, this time providing functions to open the link in a new window or in a new tab, to copy the link or to save its target.
A nice overwiew of the menu contents is available here.
Of course you can configure which mouse button RadialContext occupates; there is also a key available to access the 'normal' use of that mouse button as well. A little tip: do not use RadialContext together with MozGest - that only confuses the browser. Possible improvements (according to me) could be: a menu that does not move once it's appeared, and showing the little help text by default (reducing the useless waiting time).
I notice that on my system mouse gestures are always turned off (easy to do in the preferences), and I use the pie menu a lot. Often enought I don't even wait for the menu to appear; I have learned to memorise some of the actions and a 'wrong' movement is very rare. When my hands are on the keyboard I often use shortkeys, but if not I find nearly everything I need in the little round menu. I think it's an innovative and efficient system and I'm starting to really miss it in other browsers. Add to that the fact that RadialContext is updated regularly and the verdict is clear: I recommend you to try it out yourself sometime.
(*) : And now for something completely different
Presentation are performed in thousands of ways, and the software used can vary almost just as much. Popular programs are, among others, OpenOffice, KPresenter and PDF- or PostScript readers. Ignoring these last two, most programs use their own format (or that of Microsoft's PowerPoint). As a result the presentations are not readable on all systems, which is a big disadvantage when you can not use your own computer.
But actually, HTML fits really well for a solid presentation, certainly in combination with stylesheets. This ensures that you can display on all available platforms, and if you can use Mozilla you can even do it full-screen (under Linux full-screen only works on
1.1 and later). Just hit
It's also possible to describe your presentation in a home-made XML language, and display it nicely with CSS - of course this involves a risk with browsers whose XML or CSS support is not adequate. But it certainly works in Mozilla - I've tested it.
Are those tiny buttons still distracting your audience in fullscreen mode?
View=>Show/Hide=>Navigation Toolbar solves the problem. With RadialContext you no longer need menus and buttons! You can still type an adress if you open the location bar beforehand with
Right, now make sure that your page is smaller than the display and even the scrollbar on the side will disappear...